OpenAI launches the latest AI model GPT-4o! The response speed and quality have been upgraded; Google launched a new generation model Gemini 1.5 Pro to compete, which can handle PDF files of up to 1,500 pages! Can both be tried for free? This article actually measured 5 AI functions commonly used in life on GPT-4o and Gemini 1.5 Pro. Let you grasp at once, which AI performs better for ordinary users? What's the difference?
How to use ChatGPT-4o?
Currently ChatGPT-4o is open to all free users, but according toOpenAI official information, paying users can enjoy a higher usage limit than free users.
Users canChatGPT user interfaceIn the upper left corner, select the latest model GPT-4o.
How to use Gemini 1.5 Pro? Can I try it for free?
according toGoogle official information, currently the Gemini 1.5 Pro model is only available to paid subscription users. Subscription requiredGoogle OneThe AI advanced version costs NT$650 per month, and can enjoy 2TB of cloud hard drive space, Gemini Advanced usage rights equipped with the 1.5 Pro model, and the ability to use Gemini in Gmail and Google documents.
However, there is currently a two-month free trial period, and those who are interested can experience it this way.
If you have subscribed to the AI advanced version of Google One, you can select the advanced version Gemini Advanced to use the latest model in the upper left corner of the Gemini interface.
GPT-4o vs. Gemini 1.5 Pro actual test 1: summary of the key points of the long article
The actual test is to input an English paper and require GPT-4o and Gemini 1.5 Pro to summarize the key points in Traditional Chinese. Chat GPT outputs the answer almost immediately, while Gemini outputs the answer after about 5 seconds. Comparing the answers of the two, both are clearly presented in the form of points, and both can grasp the correct key points.
GPT-4o vs. Gemini 1.5 Pro actual test 2: planning itinerary
The two AIs were asked to plan a one-day trip to Taipei suitable for parents and children, and organize the results into a table. Both have organized the itinerary into tables, ChatGPT has additional transportation routes, and Gemini has attached attraction introductions and simple precautions.
After carefully observing the content of the itinerary, I found that Gemini should be integrated with Google Maps, and the itinerary it arranges takes into account whether it is convenient; ChatGPT only seems to stuff well-known attractions into a table, but does not take into account the transportation distance between attractions. In terms of time arrangement, Gemini's plan is more reasonable, while ChatGPT's schedule is too tight.
GPT-4o vs. Gemini 1.5 Pro Test 3: Taking food photos and asking for recipes
Upload a photo of parent-child donburi you took and ask two AIs to generate a recipe. Comparing the answers from the two, they both correctly identified the photo as "parent-child donburi", organized the required ingredients and portions into a table, and attached the cooking steps.
GPT-4o vs. Gemini 1.5 Pro Test 4: Writing community copy
AI is required to write community copy for festival marketing activities. Both can generate complete copy that meets the requirements and add emoji and hashtags. In addition, Gemini also provides suggestions for attaching pictures.
GPT-4o vs. Gemini 1.5 Pro Test 5: Writing small games in Python
People without programming language background can now create their own mini-games. The reporter tried to upload a picture of the Snake game from Wikipedia and asked the AI to write the game using Python code. It was found that ChatGPT successfully and quickly met the requirements, and after copying the code to Visual Studio Code, it could also be executed smoothly. On the other hand, although Gemini was able to generate code initially, its final answer was "I'm just a language model and can't answer your question."
GPT-4o vs. Gemini 1.5 Pro ultimate comparison, what’s the difference?
Based on the five functions tested this time, a comparison table of the advantages and disadvantages of GPT-4o and Gemini 1.5 Pro is compiled. However, this table is only based on the reporter’s actual measurement results. The actual situation may vary due to different instructions each time or future model performance improvements:
| GPT-4o | Gemini 1.5 Pro | |
| Summary of key points of long article
|
Complete content, faster speed (win) | Complete content, slow speed |
| Plan your trip | The itinerary planning is unreasonable and does not consider the distance between scenic spots. | The itinerary is well planned and considers whether it will be a smooth trip (win) |
| Take photos of cooking and ask for recipes | Can correctly identify food in pictures and provide recipes (tie) | Can correctly identify food in pictures and provide recipes (tie) |
| Write social copy | The content is complete and conforms to the social post format (tie) | The content is complete and conforms to the social post format (tie) |
| Write small games in Python | Can successfully generate executable game code (win) | Unable to generate game code |
The content of this article is for reference only and does not constitute investment advice or an invitation, solicitation or recommendation for any investment product. Readers are advised to make their own judgment and seek professional advice.
Any information on the 852Fin platform ("852Fin Information"), including but not limited to product comparisons, product ratings, blog articles, etc., is for general education and reference purposes only and does not constitute or intend to constitute any regulated advice, trust, immigration , insurance, finance, investment or other professional advice, recommendation, approval, endorsement, invitation, sale of insurance, trust, immigration, financial or investment products.
852FIN reminds readers that the content contained in this article/video is mainly from public information online and does not constitute any professional advice. Readers should seek professional advice with specific questions about products or services.
852Fin Information does not consider your personal needs, and reading the relevant information should not be regarded as a personal suitability assessment, nor can it form the basis for any decision to purchase products/services.
852FIN and the author of the pen column are not responsible for any loss or damage caused by the information contained or omitted in the article.
Before purchasing any product or service, you should conduct your own research based on the information provided by the company that provides you with the product or service, and/or seek independent and professional advice from a licensed professional. 852Fin information is collected, verified, and updated from different channels with our best efforts. 852Fin and its related parties, agents, directors, officers, and employees will not be held liable for any claims or losses arising from the relevant information. 852Fin also does not guarantee or guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the relevant information.
Discussion about this post